http://www.landoflime.com/archives/mythos/history-updates/ Haunting Pasts, Uncertain Present, Utopian Futures Wed, 08 Sep 2010 00:29:35 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6 http://www.landoflime.com/archives/mythos/history-updates/#comment-74 chandrashines Tue, 28 Feb 2006 15:36:27 +0000 http://www.landoflime.com/?p=73#comment-74 Prachi, thanks for that additional bit of information. That's interesting, partly because Bangalore was never completely controlled by the Mysore Kingdom. It would be really interesting to see how the Kannada documents might use Karnataka. Our stories don't end peacefully, do they? I am glad they dont'; otherwise, we would all be unemployed. Now back to the archives. Prachi, thanks for that additional bit of information. That’s interesting, partly because Bangalore was never completely controlled by the Mysore Kingdom. It would be really interesting to see how the Kannada documents might use Karnataka. Our stories don’t end peacefully, do they? I am glad they dont’; otherwise, we would all be unemployed. Now back to the archives.

]]> http://www.landoflime.com/archives/mythos/history-updates/#comment-73 prachi Tue, 28 Feb 2006 15:13:43 +0000 http://www.landoflime.com/?p=73#comment-73 Marathi documents from the late seventeenth century tend to differentiate between Bijapur and Karnatak, using the latter to refer to the Bangalore area. "Karnatak-Bengarul" is how it usually appears, with the mixed-up rendering of bengaluru as bengarul. they also differentiate the Hyderabad area as Bhaganagar throughout. Marathi documents from the late seventeenth century tend to differentiate between Bijapur and Karnatak, using the latter to refer to the Bangalore area. “Karnatak-Bengarul” is how it usually appears, with the mixed-up rendering of bengaluru as bengarul. they also differentiate the Hyderabad area as Bhaganagar throughout.

]]>