Skip to content

Why shouldn’t Lingayat Pontiffs support Yeddyurappa?

B. S. Yeddyurappa has survived yet another crisis and his impressive survival skills deserve more than an occasional blog post.

Here is something else that deserves a quick comment: the intervention of some pontiffs in support of the beleaguered Chief Minister, especially by several Lingayat Swamijis. If these religious leaders want to comment on political affairs, that’s fine by me. I don’t subscribe to the view that pontiffs and monks shouldn’t comment on politics. But they should also be aware that they will be seen as political figures and wouldn’t be immune from public criticism. If they want to proclaim their neutrality and then make partisan political arguments, sounding more like politicians, then these Gurus are in danger of being treated as partisan politicians.

It’s in that predicament that the three Lingayat swamijis featured above in the photograph find themselves today. They may be fringe figures within the Lingayat hierarchy but that doesn’t mean they don’t deserve our attention because they articulate a widely shared sentiment. Consider what they have to say. They see a conspiracy against a Lingayat chief minister, who is being harassed by his Vokkaliga rivals. But they hasten to add that they would have fought in favor of any chief minister, supporting his right to complete his five year term. They claim to be opposed to corruption but plead that Yeddyurappa be given an opportunity to prove his innocence. They want a thorough inquiry, proof of guilt and not just a trial in the media. They also claim that the available evidence is tainted because it has come from motivated political rivals like the Gowda family. Even if Yeddyurappa is guilty, he is guilty of only what his predecessors have done.

Note that none of this is coming from a political hack. Even Vishvesha Tirtha Swamiji of the Pejawar Math, who has been quite close to the Sangh Parivar has rushed to defend Yeddyurappa. Note that they all aren’t convinced by media reports. But the same media is reliable when it comes to defending Yeddyurappa government’s development policies and accomplishments in the last 30 months.

Perhaps, this is the dividend Yeddyurappa gets for giving away state resources - money, land and temples - to religious institutions and caste associations. We have all read reports of how Lingayat swamijis especially lobby on behalf of chosen MLAs and recommend that they be made ministers in the state cabinet. I have very strong reasons to believe this to be true. Be it through such secret interventions or public display of support, swamis have come to be seen as partisan politicians and deserve to be treated as such.

If they want a better model to be in public life, they should consider the example of Swami Agnivesh. I may not agree with him all the time but I don’t think of him as a political hack and I always listen to his arguments carefully.

Game Changers?

(Cross posted in Churumuri)

It is said that leading the Indian cricket team is the second hardest job after the Indian prime ministership.

We may add a new truism: being an Indian fast bowler is perhaps the third most difficult job.

Now, that Anil Radhakrishna Kumble and Javagal Chandrashekhar Srinath have won the elections to the Karnataka state cricket association (KSCA) and will be at the helm of cricketing affairs in the State for the next three years, they have, quite possibly, an even more difficult job ahead of them.

Their candidacy excited many reporters and commentators, within and outside Karnataka, who turned into veritable court-poets, often abdicating their day-job as journalists.

Their resounding victory has elicited hyperbole. The Indian Express calls this the “beginning of a new era in the Indian cricket administration“, and Cricinfo’s Sharda Ugra, whose analytical pieces are balanced and insightful, calls Srinath and Kumble as “gamechangers“.

Amidst this rapturous welcoming of M/s Kumble & Co, forgive me, if I sound like a sceptic.

True, Kumble and Srinath have been brilliant performers on the field and, having watched them since their junior cricket days, for over two decades, I have been a great admirer of their skills and accomplishments.

More impressive has been their personal conduct during their playing days, and since then.

It’s on that basis Kumble and Srinath sought the support and trust of KSCA members. These aren’t ordinary cricketers, who demanded that cricketers be put in charge of cricket administration.

Remember Brijesh Patel too had fought an epic battle 12 years ago against the then secretary, C. Nagaraj, against whom Patel had raised a series of corruption charges and promised to clean up cricket administration in Karnataka. In contrast, Kumble and Srinath have staked their character and integrity.

What’s been interesting about the Kumble-Srinath campaign is their message of change.

While they promise to clean up the cricket administration and turn KSCA into a model organization, we haven’t seen any specifics—either on the problems that plague KSCA or on the alternatives they have in mind. In fact, after the elections on Sunday, Kumble promised to study and come up with a blueprint for change.

Given that both Kumble and Srinath, along with their cohorts—B.K. Venkatesh Prasad, Rahul Dravid, Sujith Somasundar, Roger Binny, M.R. Srinivasa Prasad, Vijay Bharadwaj, all of whom have led Karnataka Ranji teams—have been “insiders” in a manner of speaking for decades, holding many official positions within BCCI and KSCA, I find it surprising that they have nothing concrete to say to the press, even after the elections.

What we have seen so far is a ‘campaign for change’ without specifying what that change might look like.

Sadly, our star-struck journalists haven’t asked for specific details.

Here is another interesting thing. Kumble and his team wanted complete control over KSCA. They compelled Brijesh Patel, who controlled KSCA for over a decade, to give up power. They wanted Srikantadatta Wodeyar, the outgoing president, to step aside and accept a new position of patron, which they offered to create for him.

Perhaps it made sense from their perspective to install a new team so that they could do a proper housecleaning.

Yet, troubling questions arise given how they seem to have allowed themselves to become or to be painted as de facto candidates of the Patel camp. We don’t know what promises were made to Patel; any meaningful change in KSCA will actually mean not only changing the policies of the Patel regime but also investigating Patel himself.

Kumble has forcefully asserted that he is his own man but he hasn’t addressed questions of corruption or nepotism that have plagued the Patel regime, too. Moreover, it’s not an entirely new team since there are holdovers from the previous administration like Roger Binny and R. Sudhakar Rao.

For all the paeans to their integrity in the press, I am actually reassured by Kumble & Co’s very competent politicking.

They presented themselves as the agents of change, as cricketers fighting against outsiders. They were brilliant in characterising the Wodeyar team as incumbents, which was entirely inaccurate; in fact, the Kumble team benefited from the support of the incumbents, the Patel faction.

The fact that the Wodeyar team was utterly incompetent in producing a strong response only helped them. I wish A.V. Jayaprakash had said he is no ‘interloping kabaddi player’ seeking the office of KSCA secretary but a former Karnataka captain and a distinguished international umpire.

Moreover, even before the elections, I heard from reliable sources that Srinath had been instructing KSCA staff members, especially on financial matters.

All this is better than being self-righteous because then they are more likely to become saints or martyrs. The virtue and integrity of the righteous aren’t necessarily valuable to run a public institution. Restraint, common sense, humility and a healthy dose of wiliness are.

Kumble and Srinath will need those qualities in abundance if they want to forge partnerships and build KSCA. Otherwise, for all their good intentions, they will accomplish very little.

Are they game changers? Ask me in six months but I suspect not. What ails KSCA, and generally cricket administration in India, is quite complex and is best left for another post.

***

Full disclosure: I must admit a particular bias in writing this article.

My team, the National Cricket Club (NCC), Mysore, which has been part of the Wodeyar group and represented Mysore zone in the managing committee from 2007-10, lost in the KSCA elections.

I have never been an admirer of Wodeyar and I am glad that he lost.

But NCC’s loss saddens me. That’s not just because NCC is my team but its track record in the last three years warrants strong support. I strongly believe Kumble and Srinath should have been proactive in recruiting NCC to be part of their team, especially because they know what NCC has accomplished in the last three years.

NCC’s major accomplishment of course has been organizing six Ranji trophy matches, including a classic finals match in January 2010, and maintaining what has come to be recognized as the best domestic wicket in India. We don’t realize all the work that goes into organizing a Ranji trophy match in a small center.

The members of National Cricket Club and a superb core of volunteers performed wonderfully, from ensuring supply of drinking water to spectators to tea and snacks to KSCA guests and press; erecting stands for the public to arranging internet for the Press, they did it all and in the true spirit of cricket.

All this is well known. Here are some lesser known facts. Nearly 1500 league matches were played. Five new grounds, including in smaller centers like Mandya, Chamarajnagar and Krishnaraja Nagar, were added and league matches are played regularly in all these places. Seventeen new teams were registered in the Mysore zone and al these teams take part in the State league. Distribution of KSCA resources has been equitable and selections to Mysore zone teams were extremely fair, and senior players from all teams were recruited to be part of the selection committees or to accompany the Mysore zone teams as managers. I have followed Mysore zone cricket for over two decades now and I couldn’t have written these two paragraphs about any other administration.

What’s important to recognize is that the core group of NCC are all active, and committed league cricketers: 45-year-old Harikrishna Kumar, who supervised the day to day administration of Mysore zone cricket, was also the leading wicket taker in the 2009-2010 state league.

NCC may have lost this election but Harikrishna Kumar and his friends can be proud of their tenure as KSCA Mysore zone conveners. Congratulations to them on completing a successful three year tenure.

Doosra!

Not that I know more about spin bowling than Shane Warne, but the campaign to ban ‘Doosra’ is weird, espeically when you look at what the Aussie spin fretarnity has decided:

It was a judgment based on the shared belief that the doosra, pioneered by Pakistani spinner Saqlain Mushtaq in the 1990s and since adopted by numerous tweakers, cannot be bowled legally.

Perhaps, this is one more instance of Oriental wizardry that escapes the Occidental. Like reverse swing but only until the Occidental too learns the trick. One could use more colorful language but we at the Land of Lime are quite civil.

T20 grows cricket

Peter Roebuck argues T20 is working wonders for the game. Persuasive stuff.

Astrology in University Curriculum

Star of Mysore reports today:

UNIVERSITIES TO TEACH ASTROLOGY FROM NEXT YEAR

Bangalore, June 29 (KCU)- The State Government seems to be actively considering to introduce teaching of Astrology in all the Universities of the State.

The Higher Education Department is keen on making Astrology a compulsory subject in the curriculum.

The Department is learnt to have written a letter to the Vice-Chancellors of all Universities on Saturday seeking reports within a month on the feasibilities of introducing Astrology in Universities.

Preparations are almost complete to commence an exclusive University for Sanskrit and Vedic Studies.

Noted critic Prof. Mallepura G. Venkatesh has been appointed as Special Officer. The commencement of this new University should coincide with introduction of Astrology in all the other Universities, say sources.

It appears the idea of Astrology struck to the Government following a letter from a leading Astrology Centre.

The reports to be sent by the Universities should contain the methodology of teaching Astrology, the staff needed and the type of text books needed, it is learnt.

The Government, however, seems to be keen to commence teaching of Astrology in all Universities from the next academic year itself.

Chances of opposition from the general public also cannot be ruled out. It is purely personal to believe or not to believe Astrology. Several people would surely criticise that as a superstition and the government trying to impose that on students will sure have unprecedented repercussions, predict sources.

Everyday, I read a lot of stupid stuff that our Ministers utter and one could spend a lot of time venting. But Astrology as part of university curriculum? That’s scary.

More on T20 World Cup

I watched a lot of T20 World Cup games and was glad that Pakistan won. After the Lahore attack on Sri Lankan cricketers, this was a much needed boost for Pakistani cricket. No cricket lover would like to see the game suffer in Pakistan, especially at the domestic level. Even if no international cricket is played in Pakistan for the next couple of years, if Pakistani Cricket powers to be could ensure that domestic cricket survives at all levels, then all will be fine. In these days of satellite television coverage, it’s not difficult to ensure Pakistani cricket lovers get a steady diet of international cricket involving their national team.

Couple of thoughts on T20 games.

Like all other forms of the game, T20 too is about skill and not simply slogging and power. So we got to see a lot of really good bowling, and more surprisingly, traditional innings building kinda batting. T20 strategies and tactics are still evolving and it is kinda fun to watch that process unfold, both at the IPL and T20 World Cup.

We also saw a lot of new young stars emerge at the T20 World Cup and instead of listing them, let me add a caveat. While Parnell et al look quite skilled and likely will succeed in other forms of cricket too, there is one aspect of cricket, the mental side of the game, which can not be evaluated on the basis of T20 games. Let me explain a little. Bowling a great 2-3 over spell isn’t indicative of whether a bowler is any good. What made Shane Warne great weren’t his dramatic dismissals of Gatting et al but a 7-8 over spell when he would try to set up a batsman and when we could see him thinking aloud with each delivery. T20 has no space for that.

In interesting ways, T20 began to remind me of baseball. More on that on some other occasion.